How the New York Times keeps tragedies ad-free

I was looking at the HTML source of a recent New York Times story about a tragic plane accident—150 people feared dead—and noticed this meta tag in its head:

<meta property="ad_sensitivity" content="noads" />

There are no Google results for the tag, so it looks like it hasn’t been documented, but it seems like a pretty low-tech way to keep possibly insensitive ads off a very sensitive story—an admirable effort. It’s interesting in part because it’s almost an acknowledgement that ads are invasive and uncomfortable. They cross over into the intolerable range when we’re emotionally vulnerable from a tragic story. Advertisers know this too, and the New York Times might stipulate in contracts they’ll try to keep ads off sensitive pages.

If I had to guess, I’d say this is probably a manual switch in their CMS. It would be interesting to see what sorts of stories get dubbed unfit for ads, though scraping enough article pages to get that information might raise some eyebrows on that side of the paywall.

(This information, by the way, doesn’t have to be exposed for keeping ads off pages they serve. But it could help with debugging, and definitely could be useful for syndication and maybe even displaying in official apps.)

This isn’t the first example of companies declining to advertise against tragedies. Five years ago a user documented that Gmail doesn’t show ads on emails that contain words from a certain blacklist, at a certain density—one sensitive word per 167 “normal” words.

update, 25 March: The Tragedy Tag

Since I originally posted this yesterday, two interesting things have happened. One is that current and former Times employees have confirmed my guess that this is a manual CMS switch (dating back to at least 2003), and people familiar with the CMSes at other publications like The Guardian have said there are similar systems in place.

The other thing is that the tragic story that prompted this took a turn for the worse, and the deaths that were once suspected have been confirmed. The HTML tag has been updated from "noads" to "tragedy", which employees have confirmed is the third and final position on the switch.

5 Comments

  1. saint neko
    Posted 24 March, 2015 at 17:07 | Permalink

    I saw a NRA ad on a Ta-Nehesi Coates article about the police brutality in Ferguson uncovered by the DOJ investigation. It was a headdesk moment.

  2. Bungle
    Posted 25 March, 2015 at 01:51 | Permalink

    If you want your Gmail experience to be ad-free, ask all your colleagues to include the words “died sorry” in every email to you from now on.

  3. Hans
    Posted 25 March, 2015 at 02:59 | Permalink

    I don’t think it’s about sensitive articles, but simply because of ad misplacement. That’s even worse than seeing an ad around a sensitive article.

    • Stan
      Posted 25 March, 2015 at 14:53 | Permalink

      @Hans: Why it’s worse?

      • BBQ
        Posted 26 March, 2015 at 07:00 | Permalink

        I’m not Hans, but imagine a barbeque grill advertisement next to a story about a burned down orphanage.

14 Trackbacks

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*
*